Quantcast
Channel: Featured Articles
Viewing all 36238 articles
Browse latest View live

Family Guy Presents: It's A Trap Blu-ray review

$
0
0
Family Guy Presents: It's A Trap Blu-ray

The latest Family Guy Star Wars special arrives on Blu-ray, and Ti is waiting at the door to greet it...

How much you liked the previous Family Guy Star Wars specials will be a good indicator of whether or not you'll enjoy It's A Trap. If you found the previous two instalments hilarious parodies of the Star Wars saga, then you'll love this. If you found Blue Harvest and Something Something Dark Side a bit hit and miss, then it's more of the same again.

As Seth MacFarlane recently reportedly dead-panned at Comic-Con, "It's more of exactly the same kind of jokes you've seen in the other two. So, if you like those, this is the same and you'll enjoy it just as much."

To be fair, Family Guy has always been a bit hit and miss. For every great joke the show produces, one falls flat. The fact that the opening crawl says, "Okay, you know what, we don't care. We were thinking of not even doing this one. Fox made us do it ..." simultaneously makes you laugh, yet keeps your expectations in check, even though you know MacFarlane is kidding. You think.

That's not to say the special isn't funny. It is. It's laugh out loud funny, but like many episodes of Family Guy for UK viewers, there are too many jokes that are US-specific, such as Peter asking Jabba to "do the 7-Up man's voice" and the Rancor being radio talk show and TV host, Rush Limbaugh. However, that's our problem, and not the makers of the show.

As usual, it is when the show is close to the knuckle and puerile that it is at its most hilarious. For example, 'The Emperor' electrocuting kids in a pool with his Force Lightning or Herbet/Obi-Wan Kenobi asking to 'test out' Luke's new hand. And then there's the aftermath of the Battle of Endor. Not to give anything away, but it does answer the question of what happened to any Imperial wounded.

However, the highlights of the special are the constant digs at Seth Green's career, which the Emperor and Vader constantly spout in order to try and turn Luke/Chris to the Dark Side. It's hilarious stuff and kudos to Seth Green for being a good sport about his frankly shocking filmography. "Did you see Sex Drive? Of course you didn't. You're a human being."

In conclusion, if you enjoyed the last two, it is essentially more of the same. No more, no less. It's just a shame it is the end of their Star Wars saga. It is doubtful they'll parody the prequels, as those films are jokes already.

I will say this about It's A Trap, though. It is stunning to watch, basically because the Family Guy team has animated over the actual film footage, so it looks exactly as it does in the movie. It looks even better on Blu-ray, which comes with the BD disc, a standard DVD and digital copy.

Feature-wise, it's a standard package of outtakes, brief 'making of', an amusing commentary and a "special message from Darth Stewie". But it's general filler and the chances are slim you'll really be drawn to watch any of it.

Film: 3 stars
Disc: 3 stars

Family Guy Presents: It's A Trap is out now on Blu-ray and available from the Den Of Geek Store.

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.


Season Of The Witch review

$
0
0
Season Of The Witch

Nicolas Cage stars in a fantasy movie with a healthy dose of witchcraft. What could go wrong? Here's our review of Season Of The Witch...

For a lot of people, 2010 will be a year that's mostly remembered for its consistent string of disappointing blockbusters, but for me it was a year which really allowed lower budget and independent movies to shine. I had the fortune to review several of them, including Solomon Kane and Black Death, both comparable to Season Of The Witch in terms of their strong British casts and bleak forays into the world of witchcraft and sorcery, a genre which I can never get enough of.

Consequently, I've been waiting for Season Of The Witch ever since I first heard about it, especially as it chose to combine two of my favourite things: the fantasy genre and one Nicolas Cage.

I've loved The Cage for many years, but sadly, haven't written that much about him. All you need to know is that, even in the occasional bad film, I can almost always find something to enjoy in his performance. It's a great shame that people tend to let a handful of his average films drag an incredibly varied career down, though I do understand that, like any actor, his appeal won't be universal.

However, with the inventively fun Sorcerer's Apprentice and the superb Kick Ass and Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call - New Orleans all appearing last year, the time has never been better to join the Cult of Cage. It's a great shame, then, that the only thing I'd recommend about Season Of The Witch is that you avoid it.

Things start promisingly with an opening scene that seems to imply that the film we're about to watch is going to be a black horror comedy, with almost an Evil Dead sensibility towards the portrayal of witches and the occult.

Next, we are treated to a Crusader Cage montage in the vein of any good, old fashioned action buddy movie set during the 1300s (yes, you read that right), as we see Cage, as Behmen and his brother in arms, Felson, played by Ron Perlman, slashing their way through a multitude of holy wars, quipping and guzzling ale as they go.

Behmen then makes a bit of a faux pas involving a sword and quits fighting for the church, as the film switches tone again and tries to become a kind of repentant drama, for a while anyway.

The random jumps in genre and mood are, unfortunately, the only consistent part of the film, as it utterly fails to know what it wants to be and commits one of the worst cinematic crimes: being dull.

I still can't quite believe that it's possible to make a film with Nic Cage, as a knight with a sword, and a witch, boring, but somehow it's happened.

The main crux of the story involves Behmen and Felson escorting the alleged witch to monks for her trial. You'll know this if you've seen the trailer, a journey which you'd assume to be filled with danger and adventure, yes? No. I'm not even sure whether this counts as a spoiler or not (so skip to the next paragraph if you're worried, but the journey involves this: wolves and a old rope bridge. That's it).

I wouldn't even have minded as much if the sparse set pieces were filmed with any style or excitement, but, on average, the film's effects look considerably cheaper than Solomon Kane's, while the slight gloss to most scenes robs them of any authenticity or grit.

Witch also fails to elicit any reaction from its depictions of deformed plague victims, which is quite a feat, especially when the rest of the film is a mostly bloodless affair. It's as if it doesn't even know what rating and audience it's aiming for either.

While the cast do the best with what they have, in terms of a wasted script opportunity, the blame really has to fall on to director Dominic Sena's shoulders. Here is a man who has now made, not one, but two average-to-bad Cage films (the other being Gone In 60 Seconds), which, combined with the tepid mess that was Swordfish, makes a third strike in my book.

In Season Of The Witch he has failed to capitalise on any asset given to him, with the action scenes being poorly shot and awfully edited, as even the most mundane of movements are difficult to see. (Even a setup that could potentially involve the undead is wasted.) It's like Sena has watched a few scenes from a handful of fantasy films and then lazily copied them, without any understanding of the genre, making watching this film seem like a ropey ‘best of' compilation.

Even the characters are text book clichés, with the repentant and soulful hero, his drinking/womanizing best friend, the young upstart keen to prove his worth, the suspect priest, the troubled knight with a dead family, and the cowardly con man. It really does feel like the script had only one draft, written by someone who'd seen Krull twenty years ago and then tried to rewrite it by memory, only they'd forgotten all the good parts.

I really, really tried to love the film, too, sometimes placating myself by just concentrating on my unadulterated love for Nicolas Cage, who, for the enthusiasts amongst you, only shouts one line and spends the rest of the time caught in a similar performance to his Cameron Poe in Con Air. Only without the memorable one-liners, or the interludes of heroic violence.

I held out hope right up until the finale, which then also miraculously failed to elicit any kind of emotion, tension or excitement, only adding a final insult when it attempts to pretend that it contains a twist, which it doesn't. In fact, it undoes what little good there had been in the movie's concept.

It breaks my heart to have to rate the film so lowly, especially after waiting for it for so long, and though I appreciate that this review will read like the film deserves a one star rating, the cast (with nods to Stephen Campbell Moore, Claire Foy and Misfits' Robert Sheehan) save it from being unwatchable.

If Drive Angry lets me down, expect tears.

2 stars

Thanks to the marvels of the internet, you can now follow Duncan on Twitter, here, and read about this heartache live.

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.

Producer Charles Roven on The Dark Knight Rises and Superman

$
0
0
Batman

A CGI Superman? Plans for The Dark Knight Rises? The ruling out of Batman/Superman crossover? Producer Charles Roven has been talking…

There's an interesting new interview that's just gone up over at ShockTillYouDrop.com with Charles Roven, the man who has just produced Nicolas Cage's new film, Season Of The Witch.

Roven, however, is best known for producing Batman Begins and The Dark Knight (amongst his significant list of credits), and he's also down to produce The Dark Knight Rises and Zack Snyder's upcoming Superman reboot. Inevitably, therefore, that's where the questioning led.

Firstly, Roven ruled out a future crossover movie between Superman and Batman, saying, "That may be in somebody's mind but right now the Batman lives in his world and the Superman lives in his world. Those stories are those stories and we haven't thought beyond each individual picture."

Dealing with The Dark Knight Rises first, then, Roven made complimentary comments about working with Christopher Nolan and producer Emma Thomas, before confirming that he too is under the impression that this will end Nolan's trilogy of Batman films. "Well, I think that Chris Nolan has said that he wanted to make a trilogy and this is a trilogy. As far as we all know, this is it. This is the trilogy. The Dark Knight Rises is the third part of what Chris created with Batman Begins and we're not looking past that," he said.

He did add that "I've never known Chris to do anything but focus on the movie he's making. He gets completely immersed in the movie he's doing and I know that all he's thinking about right now when it comes to Batman, The Dark Knight Rises, is making it the best movie he can. He's not thinking, ‘Wwill there be another one?'"

With regards Superman, Roven proclaimed himself a fan of director Zack Snyder, and he seems keen to be working on the film. But he also didn't rule out the idea of using a CGI Superman in the new movie. In fact, he batted the question back with a straight, "You know, one of the things that you probably know about me and us working on this movie is that the rumors are the rumors and when we have something to say, we'll say it."

It's well worth checking out the full piece, which you can find here.

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.

Stephen Sommers not directing G.I. Joe 2?

$
0
0
On the set of G.I. Joe

It looks like there’s going to be a change of personnel for the G.I. Joe sequel, with strong rumours suggesting that Stephen Sommers won’t be returning to direct…

As Paramount pushes ahead with a sequel to its pretty mediocre, yet successful, G.I. Joe movie, it's looking almost certain that there's going to be a new face in the director's chair for the sequel.

Paramount has already given a signal of its intent with the film, by bringing in Zombieland scribes Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick to pen the new film. But it had been looking likely that Stephen Sommers, who helmed the first film, would be back for the follow-up. That was in spite of tittle-tattle of unrest and unhappiness on the set of the first film, and the unimpressed critical response to the movie.

Still, if every director lost their job over rumours of set problems and a mauling from the critics, there might not be too many of them left working.

Nonetheless, with big movies of this ilk increasingly attracting more interesting directors (latest example: Darren Aronofsky helming The Wolverine), we don't see too many Internet campaigns being drummed up to protest the strong current rumour that Stephen Sommers is off G.I. Joe 2.

The news has been broken by the Los Angeles Times, which reports that "Two agents who represent other filmmakers have said they'd recently been approached about their clients coming on to helm the movie and were told that Sommers would not be getting behind the camera. Paramount declined to comment."

Thus, while there's been no official word, it's looking very likely that when G.I. Joe 2 heads into production, possibly by the end of the year, that there'll be another director calling the shots.

Los Angeles Times

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.

New trailer: Keanu Reeves in Henry’s Crime

$
0
0
Henry’s Crime

Keanu Reeves returns to comedy, opposite James Caan and Vera Farmiga, in his new film, Henry’s Crime. And here’s the trailer for it…

It's been some time since we saw Keanu Reeves tackle a comedy, but for his new film, Henry's Crime, that's just what he's doing. He plays a man who gets sent to prison for a crime that he didn't commit. And then he decides to do the crime anyway.

The film co-stars James Caan and Vera Farmiga, and while it awaits distribution in the US, it appears to be arriving in the UK on 14th January.

Furthermore, a trailer for the film has been released, and you can find that magically appearing under these very words...

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.

Meet tanker Megatron from Transformers: Dark Of The Moon

$
0
0
Transformers: Dark Of The Moon

New images pop up from the shoot of Michael Bay’s third Transformers movie, Dark Of The Moon…

There's been no shortage of set photography cropping up online for Michael Bay's upcoming Transformers: Dark Of The Moon. Yet, even as the director's computers whiz at great speed to put the necessarily graphics into his film (having wrapped photography), still more images from the shoot have appeared.

This time, it a shot of Megatron in tanker form that has popped up, this time at Inside Line. The site also has a couple of other shots from the shoot of the film, including a NASCAR-themed Wrecker that we suspect might be doing a fair amount of damage in the movie.

The film itself arrives on July 1st 2011.

Inside Line

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.

24: The Final Season DVD review

$
0
0
24: The Final Season DVD

Jack Bauer faces his eighth and final day in the final season of 24. But does it end the series on a high? Here’s Dave’s DVD review…

Jack Bauer has had a pretty tough life working in his job as counter-terrorist agent for the various incarnations of CTU. More often than not, he seems to find himself caught up in various terrorist plots that take a whole twenty-four hours to resolve. And, for what thanks?

Well, he's been kidnapped and tortured by the Chinese, put up in front of a senate committee, suffered a drug addiction, been arrested and released over and over by various authorities, lost his wife and a variety of lovers, seen his daughter kidnapped (more than once) and ended up with a few scrapes and bruises both physically and mentally and, at no point, does he seem to be really appreciated.

So, with this in mind, we move forward into Day 8 of Jack's life, in the final season of 24.

Now, Jack has a granddaughter and has patched up his relationship with his lovely daughter, Kim.  Kim's life is also looking up. She's now happily in a relationship with Stephen (Paul Wesley from The Vampire Diaries). Jack has decided to go back to Los Angeles with Kim and Stephen, after months of deliberation and uncertainty. His life will involve renting an apartment and working for a private security consultancy. So, prepare for 24 hours of Jack packing his clothes, sorting out loose ends, redirecting his mail and then a real time flight across the states as he sets up his new peaceful life.

Meanwhile, as Jack settles down for his normal life, President Taylor and President Hassan (Anil Kapoor, most famous in the UK for his role in Slumdog Millionaire) are attempting to build a peace between the fictional Islamic Republic of Kamistan and the western world.

Hassan is a bit of a revolutionary in his country with his support for two states, dislike of terrorism and willingness to co-operate with the West. In exchange, Taylor will be offering the lifting of economic sanctions and aide that will bring new economic prosperity to the region.  The very fact that two totally different worlds are about to come together in peace and harmony is enough to cause issues for those who don't want to see peace.

It should come as no surprise that Jack is quickly drawn into the plot to assassinate President Hassan when information is passed to him by an old informant by the name of Victor (Benito Martinez). Given no choice but to try to avert the collapse of the fledgling peace deal, Jack leaves his thoughts of retirement and heads back to the new high-tech CTU, led by efficiency conscious Brian Hastings and assisted by, amongst others, the practical Cole Ortiz (Freddie Prinze Jr) and his lovestruck partner, Dana Walsh (Battlestar Galactica's Katee Sackhoff).

As always, people in authority seem not to listen to Jack and he must operate outside the confines of CTU and, more importantly, above the law as he goes all out to track down an assassin, uncover a conspiracy and save the day. 

Thankfully, Chloe O'Brien is still on hand and having trouble fitting into this new incarnation of CTU. Constantly on the end of a berating, it's Chloe who sees through the wool that has been pulled over Hastings' eyes, working with Jack as he pursues his targets with relentless enthusiasm.

Chloe isn't the only familiar face in this season of 24, as Rene Walker returns, darker and more fragile, as an expert in Russian matters. Having left the FBI due to her interrogation of a suspect in Day 7, Rene is recruited to go undercover with Russian terrorists.

Running into Jack, the tension is almost palpable and, obviously, they end up working together for the greater good, undercover, up close and personal. With her FBI training pretty much on the back seat, the new Rene is a vicious woman who will stop at nothing to carry out her objective.

Undercover with the Russians, the truth about what happened to Rene during her time with the Russians drips out, as she falls back in with her Russian associate, Vladimir Laitanin (Callum Keith Rennie, also of BSG). Her actions infuriate Jack, but he has no choice but to allow her to carry out her self-destructive plan as he tries to secure weaponised uranium rods and prevent them from falling into the wrong hands. 

On the subject of darkness and brutality, as the conspiracy progresses, Hassan becomes a much more Machiavellian character, believing that he can only achieve the peace he seeks by cracking down on those who oppose or question him. His new approach leaves him at odds with President Taylor, who recognises that Hassan's actions will threaten the peace process.

In this thread alone, we get to explore the difficulties of two differing views of what is right and how they will seemingly continually struggle to achieve peace and tolerance.

At first, it seems that Hassan is going to be a stereotypical Middle-Eastern character. However, the series shows that Hassan isn't a brutal dictator. He does what he does for the right reasons, even if his actions seem wrong at the time.

Later in the season, Hassan takes matters into his own hands to prevent a catastrophe and makes the ultimate sacrifice, though not necessarily on his own terms. This finally gives his wife a chance to step out from his shadow and take centre stage.

When we're not dealing with an assassination attempt and weaponised uranium rods, we've got the rather annoying re-appearance of Dana's old flame, Kevin Wade. He's a stereotypical boy from the wrong side of the tracks, complete with goatee beard to make him look menacing. Threatening Dana's career, she has no choice (it seems) but to do what he says and help Wade commit a crime.

It's an annoying plotline as it takes away from the main story and just seems too convenient a distraction. You can almost guarantee that it'll pop up later to incriminate Dana and throw yet another spanner into the works. It's also going to cause problems when her fiancé, Cole, finds out.  After all, he's pretty much all loved up.

Cole Ortiz plays a pumped-up support role to Jack Bauer, initially driving around and dealing with stuff to keep Jack safe. As the story progresses, he has to deal with his fiancée's betrayal and support Jack, despite the instructions of his superiors. 

Prinze, Jr is good as Ortiz, a glorified action man who carries out his orders without question, yet ensures that whatever he does is the right thing. Of course, being second fiddle to Jack wouldn't be enough, so we've get to live through his belief that his fiancée is having an affair and the realisation that she isn't the lovely CTU agent he fell in love with. When he takes matters into his own hands, we've got yet another thread that, annoyingly, isn't fully resolved. It gets even worse when it's revealed that Walsh really isn't who she claimed to be and Ortiz must make some tough choices.

As if Ortiz and Walsh weren't enough, we discover that President Hassan's daughter has gone AWOL with her lover and Hassan's former chief of security. Hassan refuses to evacuate the city, despite the impending threat, leaving CTU to find his daughter, retrieve the uranium rods and save the day. Except, obviously, it's not going to go anywhere near as smoothly as that, as we discover that Hassan's daughter is being played and drives straight into CTU with a device that will disable the whole organisation, allowing the terrorists to step up their game.

The terrorists aren't the only ones playing games! Rob Weiss, one of Taylor's advisers, was instrumental in setting up the new CTU and installing Hastings as the boss. He's concerned that CTU aren't able to do the job that he thinks they should be doing and sets out to discredit Renee Walker to save his own reputation.

This isn't going to be the only time that CTU is used as a pawn as Hastings is removed, Chloe promoted, an NSA team brought in to clean up the mess and a political lapdog is parachuted in to ensure that the agenda is carried out to its conclusion.

If ever there were a story that embodied ‘Oh what tangled webs we weave', it's this one! One act of deception quickly leads to another for more than one character, as the results of their actions quickly catch up with them.

With the possibility that the peace treaty may collapse, Taylor calls in disgraced President Charles Logan (once again played impeccably by Gregory Itzin) to bring the Russians back to the negotiating table. Logan, as slippery and slimy as ever, isn't innocent in all that has happened, as we discover that he knows about the Russian's involvement in today's terrorist activities. However, he doesn't count on the tenacity of Jack Bauer as he manages to demolish Logan's operation pretty effectively. He isn't going to go down without a fight and his poison soon spreads to Taylor.

What starts out as a hunt for missing uranium rods and a quest to uncover those behind the death of a political leader quickly becomes a quest for vengeance, as Jack takes matters into his own hands.   Even wounded, Jack proves resourceful, despatching those who have wronged him in rather creative (though unseen) ways, whilst still gathering evidence and making his presence felt.  Whilst Chloe and Cole try to track him down, he cuts a swathe of red across the city, leaving a trail of destruction for all to see.

24 gives us, not surprisingly, 24 episodes of political intrigue and deception, collapsing and strengthening bonds, coupled with double crossing and red herrings. Manny Coto and Brannon Braga, with the help of a talented team of writers, have crafted yet another fast moving Boys' Own Adventure that moves along so quickly and has so many threads to it that it is often difficult to keep up with what is going on.

Whilst it may seem an annoyance, the subplots of Dana and Ortiz actually break the tension of the main story, eventually bringing Dana back into the main story as an essential component, though it still seems rather implausible that her cover would be broken and that a probation officer happens to be dropping by at this particular moment in time.

When it isn't delivering all out action, 24 manages to tell a pretty good political story. It doesn't have the depth of a series like The West Wing, but it still conveys the power struggle within the White House and the seemingly endless desire of the presidency to hold itself up as a bastion of morality whilst dealing in the darkness that it has sometimes created. 

Whilst Walker may want to be seen as moral and just, her staff often gets their hands dirty in order to get the job done.  ventually, even Walker, losing control and tainted by Logan, succumbs to the necessity of sin as she uses the threat of military might to protect something that she holds dear. 

Casting the President as a bully with all the toys is a brave move for an American television series, especially one as popular as 24. Corrupt presidents, puppet presidents and inept presidents are easy to accept. Bullying presidents who, even when they are wrong, use their position as leader of the free world to get what they want, are a chilling reminder of the sheer power of one country on the world stage.

So, in 24 The Final Season, we've had terrorist threats, nuclear weaponry, political shenanigans and a president that falls and then attempts to rebuild bridges. However, Jack's story ends with him pretty much on the run, again. It's an emotional ending, between Jack and Chloe, that isn't the big, blow-out that might have been expected and definitely leads into the touted big screen version. 

You know he's going to be back, called upon when the US needs defending, and it might have been disappointing, except it seems to be a fitting way to end the series.

The acting is, once more, top notch throughout the whole season. From the second he speaks, Anil Kapoor is incredibly charismatic, proving that his role as Prem Kapur in Slumdog wasn't a one-off.  He has one of those voices that rumbles with confidence, authority and warmth.

On top of that, his presence radiates from the screen in every scene in which he appears. Hopefully, he'll appear in more English language work in the near future. There's something almost Shakespearean about his performance, alongside his onscreen wife Dalia, played brilliantly by Necar Zadegan. Zadegan gets the opportunity to turn her performance right up in the final hours of the season, as she grudgingly takes centre stage and discovers many disturbing truths that don't sit well with her own beliefs.

The return of President Taylor allows Cherry Jones to put in a multi-faceted performance alongside the returning Bob Gunton as Taylor's trusted ally, Ethan Kanin. Together Jones and Gunton are a spectacular team, giving the impression of elder statesmen who may seem a little jaded, but are working towards the same goal, even if they don't share full disclosure. 

Kiefer Sutherland gives yet another robust performance as Jack Bauer. He even looks masculine with his manbag! Every threat he makes seems real, leaving in you no doubt that he would really shoot you if he so much as believed you might know something. 

Huge respect goes to the wonderfully talented Mary Lynn Rajskub, who first appeared as Chloe in Season 3 and has gone from being annoying, antagonistic and socially inept to, well, annoying, antagonistic and socially inept, but trustworthy and talented, with a mean comic streak.

As the series as progressed, Chloe has moved up to more of a leading role, complete with family and history, and Rajskub has demonstrated her ability to deliver subtle comedy and intense drama. In this season, she takes control of CTU as Acting Director. It's a real shame that we won't get to see more of the character in this role.

Katee Sackhoff and Freddie Prinze Jr spend a little too much time being loved up, until Sackhoff's Dana has a ghost from her past make a reappearance and threaten to ruin her life. However, later in the series, both actors get chance to flex their acting muscles as the truth about Dana's background rushes to the surface and Ortiz finds himself implicated in her deceit.

One of 24's strengths is the way in which it shows that finding and neutralising terrorist threats is not primarily down to high technology or political manoeuvring, but down to manpower and perseverance. Whilst the President and Hastings may stand there, wringing their hands and making demands, Jack goes in with a gung-ho attitude, pulling together seemingly random threads and bringing it all together in a blaze of glory. 

Everyone in the series has weaknesses and the series manages to expose these effectively, without ever stepping into the realm of pantomime villainy or soap-style melodrama. Having been borne in the shadow of 9/11, there's something patriotic about Jack's actions as he attempts to prevent terrorists from invading America's home front. He may not be the clean-living, law abiding action hero, but he gets the job done, despite those who stand in his way.

Extras

Extended episodes bring an additional two minutes to a number of episodes. The scenes appear to be mostly dialogue driven and offer a little more insight into characters and their motivations. You can choose to watch the extended episodes or the original television versions.

Ultimate CTU is a short feature about the creation of the new CTU and the transfer to New York. We get to see Carlos Barbosa discussing his design and the location scouting process.   Disappointingly, we don't get to visit the location, an island that features a derelict former smallpox hospital. However, we do get to see some of the designs and how they were realised for screen. Short, but interesting, it's amazing the amount of work that goes into creating what is, ultimately, a temporary structure and the lengths that the crew take to maintain the sets.

Scene Makers are short (usually under three minutes) featurettes that look at the making of particular scenes, particularly those that feature action sequences. Despite their length, they are quite interesting, showing the techniques (some of which aren't as technical as you'd expect) used to create some of the more memorable moments. Once again, cast and crew talk about their involvement in the scene, discussing the filming process, stunt work and effects worked involved.

Deleted Scenes are scenes that could have been added back into the episodes, given that there are already extended episodes in this boxset. Particularly of interest are the various scenes featuring President Taylor as she attempts to keep the peace process on track.

Virtually New York runs for nine minutes and explores the difficulties of filming in New York and the use of digital backlot to cover up some of the budgetary issues of filming on location. It's amazing to see the scenes that genuinely looked like they were filmed on location are actually green screen effects. Some CGI sequences are also discussed, including the helicopter chase sequence, which was part visual effect and part CGI, including the windows of the chopper! 

Chloe's Arrest is an unusual sequence that is also referred to as Chloe's Interrogation on the box, featuring Chloe as she is questioned by FBI agents about the location of Jack Bauer. With nothing really substantial to frame the sequence, it comes across as more of a deleted scene than anything else.

On the bonus disc:

Comic-Con 2009 is a 31 minute recording of the panel that was held at, not surprisingly, the Comic-Con 2009 event. Alongside producers and composers, we have Kiefer Sutherland, Mary Jane Rajskub (pronounced, I've discovered through this, 'rice cub'), Katee Sackhoff, Freddie Prinze Jr and Anil Kapoor. Of course, there's nothing contentious in the discussion, and it's obvious that the cast and crew represented are passionate about what they've done. Being filmed before Day 8, there are few spoilers or discussion of the plot. 

Eight Days is a four part featurette that can also be played together. Collectively, they run for a total of 28 minutes.

Jack Bauer: Evolution of a Hero features cast and crew talking about Jack Bauer and how the character evolved. It's interesting hearing the recollections of the past years, particularly reminding us that Jack started out as quite happy and respectful of the work he did. Various producers and writers talk about how Sutherland became the role and Sutherland himself comments on his lack of TV experience.

Presidents, Friends and Villains looks at the various colleagues, peers and villains that Jack has encountered. Writers talk about their love of writing for various characters, Logan, Chloe and David Palmer amongst them. They comment that the show "isn't just an action show, it's a character drama with action." Sadly, no actors from previous seasons return to talk about their roles. There's also comment on shows that were modelled on 24 and failed.

Memories and Moments allows the producers to talk about their recollections of the past eight years. Short clips are played to frame these memories that range from explosions to interrogations. There are comments on things that happened outside of the series, such as Bill Clinton's love of the show and how the producers visited some actual locations, including a nuclear submarine and the White House. Bizarrely, there's a conversation about the smoking room, in which many things are discussed and actors have saved the lives of their characters!

Goodbye does feature previous cast members as they gather for an 'exclusive party' to celebrate the end of 24. It's great to see people like Dennis Haysbert (President Palmer) return and talk about their memories, albeit briefly. There's also some footage of the last day of filming the final scenes of the series, commented upon by the writers. 

It would have been nice to see some features focusing on the publicity campaign for this season, or lengthier features on the stunt work and effects work. Overall, though, the extras are worth watching, with the Scene Makers features being a welcome addition that, hopefully, other television series might replicate.

Let's face it, if you're thinking about buying 24: The Final Season, then chances are you've bought or seen the first seven seasons. I could say it was a pile of horse droppings, and you'd probably still pick it up. Truth be told, it isn't bad at all. 

24, as a series, may have lost its way and  become a bit 'paint by numbers' over the years, but it still tells a compelling story of one man and his ongoing quest to see justice done, no matter what the cost.

Show: 4 stars
Discs: 3 stars

24: The Final Season is out now and available from the Den Of Geek Store.

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.

The Muppet Show episode 22 review

$
0
0
The Muppet Show

Our look back at The Muppet Show continues, with episode 22 guest starring Broadway legend Ethel Merman. Here’s Glen’s review...

By the time this show aired, its guest star Ethel Merman had a successful Broadway career spanning forty years, as well as appearing in numerous films, including Airplane!, and TV shows. Famed for her powerful voice and introducing many songs which would become standards of the musical genre, Merman was a giant of the stage.

Sadly, though, just when it looked as though things were picking up, we're hit with another episode that sees a slide to the bad old days of earlier on in the series. Given the giant of Broadway that Merman is and the previous success other stars of the musicals have enjoyed this series, this is something of a surprise and a disappointment. Granted, Merman was by no means as sprightly as some of the other stars who appeared previously, but she was deserving of better material than what she got here.

Her medley of Broadway hits and closing number of There's No Business Like Show Business were both solid sketches, but the other interactions, along with much of the other material in the show, fell flat, making this episode a frustrating experience following such a good run of episodes.

The medley was great fun and crammed many hits into a short space of time, making it a relentlessly entertaining sketch that is the show's highlight by some distance. Seven songs are performed starting with a duet of Cole Porter's You're The Top with Kermit, which was introduced by Merman in the musical Anything Goes. This was followed by two other Porter penned numbers in Friendship, which appeared in Anything Goes ,although its origins were in another Merman lead Broadway production, DuBarry Was A Lady, and DeLovely with Gonzo and Scooter admirably filling in for the Bob Hope role of the song, which had its origins in the musical Red Hot And Blue.

These were followed with two numbers by Irving Berlin, You're Just In Love from Call Me Madam and Anything You Can Do from Annie Get Your Gun, the latter of which sees Merman and Miss Piggy clashing for comedic effect. The medley closes with all of the performers of the various numbers in a rendition of Mutual Appreciation Society from Happy Hunting. With the exception of the last two numbers, the medley requires very little physical exertion from Merman, who remains stationary throughout much of the performance.

As mentioned earlier, the performance of There's No Business Like Show Business is solid, but this is expected, given that it's a song that Merman is famed for performing throughout her career. The song would go on to be performed a number of times in future episodes of The Muppet Show.

There's a sketch that provides a showcase for Australian puppeteer Richard Bradshaw's talents, which replaces the At the Dance segment, providing a welcome break, even if it's a little out of kilter with the rest of the show. Another mildly entertaining, but by no means exceptional sketch is a musical number involving Statler and Waldorf as Miss Mousey sings Don't Sugar Me to the resident hecklers.

Sadly, beyond this there's very little of merit in the show. The opening of Java performed by two dancing tubes is mildly amusing at first, but outstays its welcome. The running theme of the show of Fozzie's agent trying to get him a pay increase is dull and not really fitting with the episode.

It was shown that they could do good running themes with the Vincent price episode, so it's frustrating that they didn't go for an all out musical theme. Granted, it was explored to a certain extent previously, but the potential was there and sadly squandered.

It's a shame that an episode this poor came at this stage of the series, especially as it looked as though it would close strong. Let's see if the remaining two can recapture some of the magic seen recently and close the series on a high note.

You can read our remembrance of episode 21 here.

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.


Aron Ralston interview: 127 Hours, Danny Boyle, Simon Beaufoy and more

$
0
0

With 127 Hours out now in cinemas, we were lucky enough to meet with Aron Ralston, who told us all about his extraordinary story of survival…

In May 2003, 27-year-old mountain climber Aron Ralston narrowly avoided death when he fell down a narrow canyon in the Utah desert. With his right arm pinned beneath an immovable boulder, in freezing conditions with little water and no food, Ralston faced certain death, and even recorded farewell messages on a camera, before finally freeing himself five days later in a manner few would dare contemplate.

His extraordinary story was reported all over the world, recorded by Ralston himself in his bestselling book, Between A Rock And A Hard Place, and is the basis of Danny Boyle’s new movie, 127 Hours, in cinemas now.

We were lucky enough to meet with Ralston for a round-table interview, where we discussed the film and his remarkable experiences. Ralston's recollections were candid, thoughtful, and often exceptionally moving.

I understand you were heavily involved in the making of the movie?

For sure, yeah. It was a big part of the feeling that Danny [Boyle] and the team had earned my trust. I think if they’d have wanted me to give them my story and then go away, I’d have been, like, “I’m not so sure about that, guys.” So it was reassuring to me, and important, in that sense, that I could still be involved, and I felt respected that they wanted that.

It’s obviously a big part of my identity, of who I am. And to have this story as a gift to share with people, I had to build a detachment, so I wasn’t in the kitchen adding spice to the stew while the cooks weren’t looking – it needed to be their project. I don’t know how to make a movie, so it needs to be them doing that work.

Were you often on set?

Not every day. Once a week, I was there. I was as accessible as much as they wanted me to be. Journalists came to see the set, and so I did interviews with the folks there. And then it was partly just personal – one of the trips, we went to the real canyon, where they were filming. I got to be there, because it was the seven year anniversary after I’d been trapped in the canyon, and that was a very special time in my life, to be able to go and be there again.

I think there is some credence to the way our bodies rejuvenate themselves, where some cells grow and others die off. There’s an urban legend that after seven years all the trillions of cells in your body will have died and been completely replaced. So I’m literally a brand new person at that moment. I’m no longer the same person that walked into this canyon seven years ago, or the person who walked out. There’s been this cycle that’s come full circle.

With the film, especially, having had my baby boy, and envisioned him seven years ago when I was trapped – when I see that scene with the little boy, I cry so much at that part of the film. It invokes such a connection and emotion. One of the most loving relationships in life is between a parent and a child.

I had pictures of him on my digital camera, and I was looking at them standing by the rock, and I took the camera and showed the rock the pictures of my son. It was like sharing.

How changed are you as a person as a result of this experience? There’s a moment in the movie were you said how selfish you were before.

It was like I took my family for granted. I hadn’t expressed my gratitude to them. There’s a line on the video tape that James delivers verbatim from what I said to the camera, and it was, “Mom and Dad, I want to say I’m sorry. I feel like I haven’t appreciated you enough in my heart as I could have. I regret it now. I regret that I had been a little walled off.”

I think everyone, as you grow up, has to become independent and more self-reliant, increasing especially as you move through your teenage years and your 20s. I’d done that maybe more than most. At the time I was there in the canyon, I was 27 years old, and I was looking at how I’d moved so far away from my family, in a sense, and distanced myself, and maybe even walled off from relationships in general.

I’d become very obsessed with being outdoors and adventures. My whole life was going into mountaineering and climbing, and there was a cost to that. What’s most important about life? It’s not the number of mountains I’ve climbed, it’s the relationships. These people that have spent time with me. I was, like, “I wish I’d spent more time with them. I wish I’d said thank you more often. I really regret that.”

In terms of how it changed me, I had these epiphanies, like “This is what life is about” when I was trapped, and I got out and recovered, with a lot of help from my family and friends. But then I went right back to doing all those things I was doing – being obsessed with adventure and climbing and athleticism.

It was like I didn’t learn anything, at least for a few years. I had these epiphanies, but they didn’t change me. I think that’s true of a lot of things that come too easily or too quickly – it doesn’t stick, it doesn’t last. You might ask why, if I cut my arm off, I didn’t learn my lesson. But that’s how deeply rooted the issues I used to have were – my ego, my desire for fulfilment, my obsessions.

It took a long time before I was able to move past what I was doing with adventure and climbing, and really start to focus on relationships. It’s taken getting married and having a baby to pull me out of that life and move forward into a new one – I think that’s part of coming full circle. It didn’t just happen, even after that transformative experience in the canyon. I just went back to being the same brazen guy that you see at the beginning of the movie.

The guy who swims up to the edge of the pool and sees his friends and family, and the guy sitting on the couch with his wife and baby, it takes seven years before that comes around.

Are you more careful now than you used to be?

Since I’ve been a father, definitely. I still climb, and I mountain guide a little bit. To go out into the outdoors, there’s always going to be risk and decisions that go into that, and I feel that I notice now when I make a decision. Even up to a few years ago, I was “Go ahead, it’ll be fine” and do something riskier than necessary. Today, I see myself making decisions that the little voice, instead of saying “Go ahead” says “Think about [your son]. Do what’s cautious.” I find myself making different decisions.

In some ways, there’s not just decision making or precaution, but there’s also the focus. What’s most important in my life is my family. I don’t spend so much time outdoors alone, even compared to a few years ago, because my focus is on being with them.

Last year was a big year. My grandmother passed away, so we had a death. We bought a house. The film was like starting a new job. Having a baby. My wife and I had just got married a few months before that, and we went through all these changes over the span of a year.

You’re not going to spend 90 per cent of your life rafting, skiing or mountaineering like I was doing previously.

I’m sure your son will naturally grow up to be an outdoors person. How would you advise him, with your experience?

We’re already teaching him about animals and water. He loves looking at it all. Teaching him about the wonderment of the outdoors. He’s a very physical little boy, as witnessed by the fact that he loves doing laps on the stairs. He doesn’t like to go down, only go up [Laughs].

I think, like anything between a parent and a child, you have to get to the point where you say, “Okay, we’ve given you the skills and the knowledge. Now it’s up to you to go off and do what you want to do.” If, when he’s 18, he wants to go climb a mountain in Utah in the wintertime solo, like I was doing, I think by that point I’ll say, “I’ve done what I can, I’ve prepared you as well as I could have” and hope they survive their learning curve.

I wouldn’t say I have any advise to him I could boil down into a nugget. But up to a certain point it’s up to me to give him the practise and the skills he needs, and it’s my job later to say, “Okay, you’re on your own. We’ll be here for you if you need any assistance.” My parents were definitely there for me. Just like any mother would, my Mom showed up in a very strong way when it was discovered that I hadn’t turned up for work. She said, “He’s in trouble. Something’s not right. He needs our help.”

Within 25 hours, not even knowing what state I was in, she found my truck and had a search team and helicopters coming in. Actually, two other helicopters were en route to join the search. You don’t have much time for someone who’s been out for that long without water in the desert.

Little did they know what had actually happened. It really was like the movie poster says – every second counts. It was slipping away very quickly.

Back at the beginning, when Simon Beaufoy was obviously going about the tricky task of writing about what happened to you, was there ever a debate over how much the events should be fictionalised?

We had a lot of discussions about it. And this was, again, why I felt honoured to be a part of it – in most Hollywood situations, where they take a true story and adapt it to be a film, whoever provides that original source material is told, “Alright, great! Thanks!” Good luck having any input on it.

It illuminated for me the challenges that they faced. I thought, how much more drama do you need? It’s all there. The thriller aspect, the timing, this idea that a person could do something like this. I’ve always enjoyed survival dramas like that too.

And they said, “Yeah, but this is film. It’s very different” They have to condense things, and expand other things. They have to explain things without being too expository, to show an audience the wonder of the desert, to take the audience through the thought processes I went through. They had to show what happened in a worse case scenario.

So there were these fantasy sequences, and things that are dramatised or fictionalised. We had a very poignant conversation when we went out on a hike. [Simon Beaufoy] is a kind of an outdoors guy – one of the outdoorsman of the whole crew. Most of the rest of them were more “I’ll stay on the sidewalk, thanks.”

Simon and I had a really good discussion. He described the concept that a fictionalisation can convey the essence of truth even more than just a raw display of facts, because it can bring people through an emotional experience where they feel something, as opposed to being told about a feeling. That was Danny’s feeling from the beginning too. Instead of having me in a documentary talking about this experience, and telling an audience, that we identify an actor who’s taking us through the experience.

Simon, with that nugget about fiction and truth - I’ve seen how it works. That brilliant part in James [Franco]’s performance where he’s doing the self interview towards the end of the film. He’s on the morning talkshow, and he’s the interviewer and the interviewee and the caller. I didn’t do that – I didn’t interview myself on camera. I did those recordings, and a lot of what he said was what I said – the self-criticism, the logistics of a potential rescue, the realisation that I’d been looking for this moment of destiny that was coming to a head. I’d created it. I wanted it. I’d been looking for it all my life. All these things were real for me in the delirium and everything else besides.

That was a demonstration of the concept. It takes the audience through a variety of emotions and experiences. It’s truthful in content, but the way it’s delivered is, basically, made up.

I think they did a really great job of that. How do you go about understanding the consequences of a flash flood? For me, when I did it, I said into the camera, “I’ve been thinking about what might happen if the canyon flooded. I’d probably drown, but at least I’d get a drink of water.” And so that’s very dry and straightforward.

What’s cinematic is seeing the flood build and how shocking it is to have those first drops hit, or the flash of thunder and lightning, the torrent build steadily and moving rocks. It was like this nightmare fantasy. I love what they did with a lot of that. It was necessary, and if I’d clung too tightly to it, they couldn’t have done that.

My wife was pretty instrumental. She’s a great counsellor. She’s there reminding me that they’re artists, and you don’t want to spoil their creativity.



In the book and the film, you say “Rocks fall all the time”. Do you feel what happened was destiny?

I directly caused that rock to move, because of how I dangled from it, and where I put my weight. I pulled it loose accidentally – I didn’t do it intentionally – but in a sense, that was what I was out there through all these adventures. I came to the conclusion that I’ve been wanting this to happen. I’ve been reading books, I’ve been wanting to know, “What would I do if my life was on the line” and now here it is. I even knew that when I was trapped. I knew this was an experience I had created, and also wanted. I said this to the camera.

It wasn’t just a physical experience, but a spiritual one, about attaining self-fulfilment. What I was here for was to discover myself. Cosmically, that’s what I think about the universe and all of us, that we’re all part of the universe experiencing itself. It’s a big experiment.

For me in that canyon, and James says it, that the rock’s been waiting for me my whole life. There’s a little bit of exaggeration from what I really said, but I was almost being drawn by forces unseen – less external, more internal. That’s what I wanted for myself. I subconsciously created it. I’d built up a whole repertoire of experience that I took with me in that canyon. I’d quit my job, and dedicated myself to these passions, so I was at the level of fitness I was at when I got there.

I was an engineer by my university training, so I had an understanding of search and rescue, rope systems, the logistics of what happens in rescues.

I chose to go to that canyon. I chose to go to the desert without telling anybody where I was going. I met those two girls, then chose to go my own my way. My friends tease me still. “Next time, go with the girls. What were you thinking?” [Laughs.]

I speak about destiny not like it was some predetermined fate that God had laid out for me, but more like an interaction of my freewill and circumstances. I’d been looking for it, and there it was.

You put yourself in extreme situations, because that’s what lots of mountain climbers do. You found yourself in the ultimate survival situation, and made your decisions accordingly.

Exactly. That’s what we all do. As much as we say we want easy street and the good life, it’s boring. Sure, it’s okay for a little while, but we relish challenges. It’s what we’re made to do. Whether it’s a trauma or adversity, or loss, we seek out, through our experiences, situations for ourselves. People who love very intensely grieve very intensely.

We go through these cycles of feeling like our lives are on the line, and then the relief once it’s over is part of what’s here for us. My story’s sort of an allegory like that. The boulders in are lives are also our lessons.

This is one of the greatest things that ever happened to me, because of the lessons and the growth. You don’t grow, you don’t learn a lesson unless you pay a price for it, and I think that’s a necessary part of growing up, to struggle.

There’s the Buddhist idea that life is suffering and loss, and it’s true – that’s how we grow into our highest potential. Without extraordinary circumstances, we wouldn’t realise our extraordinary potential.

But you didn’t always know you were going to survive…

Definitely not, no. In fact, from the moment I turned the camera on, that was me acknowledging that I wasn’t going to survive. And that came 24 hours into being trapped. The first message I left on the tape was, “Whoever finds this, please get it to my parents.” Straight off, I knew I’m not going to get out of here.

How long was the tape?

Just a few minutes shy of 60 minutes. I’d maybe taken five minutes of other stuff at the beginning of the tape. I got all the way to the end by the fifth day, and rewound and watched it all through, criticising. It was so incoherent at moments because I hadn’t slept. It was kind of funny and ironic that I was like a director telling an actor. “Go back, do it again!” [Laughs.]

I rewound it to the beginning and taped over a few minutes of stuff prior to when I got trapped. All the way up until an hour before I realised what I could do to get myself free. But for days I’d tried to saw at my arm and stab my arm, just like you see in the film.

I went through an evolution, at first I don’t even want to consider the idea of cutting my arm off, and then by and by, I become more desperate, having figured out the plan of using the tourniquet. The bones being too hard for the blade left me in the situation where, even over these rollercoasters of hope and despair, it was finally the fifth day when I came to peace with this.

Even from the second day when I knew I was going to die, it was the fifth day when I knew it was out of my hands. There was nothing more I could do to save myself. There was an abiding calm that came over me. That’s like the feeling of faith in your life, that it’s not up to me. A relaxation comes from that, acceptance.

It was on the fifth night when I had the vision of a little boy, that told me I’m not going to die, I’m going to get out of here. I saw myself with a handless right arm, playing with him. That was the future. Me, not here, without a hand, with a little boy. The way he looked at me, I knew that he was my son.

In a blink, it was all gone, and I was back, shivering in the canyon. But it changed everything. I knew I’m not going to die here.

And then after you’d freed yourself, you had to rappel down a cliff…

It was a very awkward rappel, too. But I was adrenalised. I was more invigorated with life than I’d ever been when I freed myself. What nearly overcame me was the euphoria, being out of that spot.

What you see at the end of the film, where the little boy appears to James, and he figures out how to bend his arm. That’s the epiphany that leads to him getting out. I don’t have to cut through the bones, I can break them.

The boulder becomes an inversion: it’s not trapping me anymore, it’s actually freeing me. Without the rock holding me the way it was, I couldn’t have done that. So as I broke the bones I had a smile on my face. It was like the most euphoric thing that I’ve ever done. The most painful thing too.

There were times when I severed the nerve and it was like I’d incinerated my arm. It was liquefied in heat. It’s hard to describe what it’s like. But in the moments right after that, I was smiling. All the possibilities of life swelled up, all these great moments. Maybe I’ll see that little boy. Maybe I’ll get back to my Mom.

I think they delivered that extremely well in the film. I know it’s a moment that audiences aren’t sure if they can handle it, and then they get through it, like, “Woah!” But you do, you get through it. And audiences I’ve seen it with clap and cheer.

Sometimes they’re very quiet and overwhelmed, but it delivers this uplift. There’s pain, excruciating experience and intensity, and then there’s something that makes all that irrelevant, something worth living for.

To me, that’s what the real message of the story is. Yeah, it’s the guy who cuts his arm off, but what it’s really about is what’s more important than cutting your arm of.

So many good things have happened to you since.

I certainly am grateful. I wrote a book, I do speaking engagements. I’ve been gifted with something that’s very valuable to share with people, so I feel almost like it’s a responsibility to not just speak to corporate groups who can pay my fee, but also schools and non-profit fundraisers.

I also do work for wilderness groups that protect these landscapes. In Europe, you don’t  have many places where, when the camera pulls back, you can see for 50 miles in every direction, pristine landscape. That doesn’t just happen – there are groups that work hard to protect these places from roads and oilrigs and nuclear reactors.

I work for disabled veteran’s groups. I’ve been able to develop some things that pull smiles on people’s faces.

There’s a lot with this story that helps people. In some cases, it’s even saved their lives. There was a really poignant example of this.

I was still in hospital, and depressed, because I didn’t cut my arm off and get out of the canyon to then be hooked in a bed on IVs and 18 pills of narcotics a day. I couldn’t even tell my parents I loved them. There was a month of that, and I thought, “This isn’t life.”

But a lady wrote a card to me, saying she’d been in depression, and even had a plan of killing herself on the anniversary of her husband’s death. She had her sleeping pills, and was going to overdose, and that was going to be it.

She read my story in a magazine, and she wrote and said it showed her a light in the darkness. It saved her life – she flushed her pills, remembered her grandkids’ faces and said, “That’s what I’m going to live for.”

At that moment when I was in a dark place, it reflected back to me, and told me “This isn’t the time to give up, Aron.” It’s definitely brought me a great fortune, both in terms of wealth and life. It’s given me a purpose, to share this with people. It helps in all kinds of ways, most I’ll never know of, but now and again I’ll get a Facebook message or something like that.

Someone comes up after the film and says, “I got out of my seat, and called my Mom before I even left the theatre. I haven’t spoken to her in a couple of years.” It changes people. I’ve needed stories of hope to inspire me in dark times, and that’s what I’m so grateful for to the film team, Danny and everyone.

Aron Ralston, thank you very much.

Interviews at Den Of Geek

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.

First images from Spielberg's Terra Nova

$
0
0
Terra Nova

Steven Spielberg goes back to the dinosaurs, with his upcoming TV project, Terra Nova. And here are the first images from it...

Steven Spielberg is a busy man. As well as his numerous film projects (Tintin, The War Horse, Lincoln), he is overseeing several TV shows including Falling Skies and Fox's headliner for the 2011/2012 season, Terra Nova.

Terra Nova was famously pushed back from last year to budget concerns, but the premise is intriguing. It's about a family journeying back to the Earth in prehistoric times, travelling from 2149. Their mission? An experiment to save humanity. What could go wrong there?

It's an excuse for dinosaurs too, of course, something that Spielberg is no stranger to. And the potential is here for something really quite special.

Just released, then, are these first images, which show Jason O'Mara (Life On Mars remake) as Jim Shannon. A series preview will air in May 2011, and we'll bring that to you then.

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.

Not Going Out series 4 episode 1 review: Drugs

$
0
0
Not Going Out: Drugs

Lee Mack and Tim Vine return in the first episode of Not Going Out since its reprieve from the axe. And the show is on very, very good form…


4.1 Drugs

If the original axe-wielders at the BBC had had their way, then this is a review that would never have been written. For, even before the third series of Not Going Out had finished airing, the Beeb announced that it wouldn't be commissioning a fourth. The show was canned.

Thank goodness, then, for the persistence of Lee Mack and the team at Avalon, who somehow managed to turn the heads in the BBC's secret bunker, and earn the show a reprieve. For the show is surely about as good a studio-set sitcom as Britain has got right now. And that's no double-edged compliment.

Appreciating that Not Going Out is going up against laugh-desert My Family and limited shows of that ilk, it nonetheless is, for my money, at least, one of the best British sitcoms of recent times.

I mean it, too. Because, if the aim of a situation comedy is to entertain you for half an hour and get you laughing, then who can argue with what Not Going Out manages? And I, for one, often found myself laughing like a drain (terrible analogy, but it seems to be popular) at it. Time after time.

It's not edgy. It's not got handheld cameras. It's not daring. It's just funny. Very funny.

Fortunately, series four is already proving to be very funny too, even if it does kick off with one of the show's more contrived plotlines. The narrative base of the episode is that Tim (Tim Vine) manages to grab the wrong coat, and thus find himself with a large packet of drugs in his pocket. So, then you get the coat swapping, more coat swapping, a bit of torture, and a happily ever after ending.

Still, this is all a platform for what the show does best, and once it's put its story in place, this opening episode of series four showers you with laughs. Many of them come from structuring around the beefed up role for Katy Wix as Daisy, who gets more screen time now than Miranda Hart's Barbara has moved on. Now, granted, Daisy is the stereotypical dimwit, but the script weaves jokes around her with skill, and Wix is strong in the part.

But it's the main trio who remain the main reason to watch the show. We get slightly less of Sally Bretton's Lucy in this episode, and it allows us to have plenty of fun with Lee Mack's Lee and Tim Vine's Tim. Both are skilful comedy performers, and here they prove so again. Mack, in particular, delivers lines with such skill it's hard to find many comedians on television to match him. His "it's all kicking off in Narnia" moment was priceless.

Appreciating the pressure that was on the show to come back strongly after the axe had fallen, I thought that Drugs was a smart start to a promising series. It's not going to convert anyone who's been left cold by the show in the past. Yet, if you go by the measurement that a successful comedy film gives you five solid laughs, then it's surely worth celebrating a sitcom that can offer you more than that in under half an hour.

Not Going Out airs on Thursdays at 9:30pm on BBC1, and repeats on BBC HD Fridays at midnight.

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.

The Best TV Episodes of 2010

$
0
0
The Best TV Episodes of 2010

Doctor Who! Ashes To Ashes! Lost! We choose our favourite episodes from 2010’s greatest geek TV shows…

2010 was a smashing year for telly. While there were a fair few shows that left us cold, and that failed to really grab our attention, there were plenty of shows that demonstrated the quality of writing and production values that are prevalent on the small screen.

Here's our selection, then, of some of the very finest television episodes we saw throughout 2010. We'd have added episodes from Community, Supernatural and Stargate Universe, too, had we been able to pick one in particular for each of those shows...

Quick update: Just to clarify, we only allow one episode per show!

 

ASHES TO ASHES
Series 3 Episode 8

Last year, Dexter took home the overall best TV episode crown for the year from ourselves, and had we not dispensed with the idea of pulling one show out as the finest of all, it would have been in the running again. But then, so would the stunning concluding episode to the Life On Mars/Ashes To Ashes saga, one of the most mesmerising pieces of television of 2010, bar none.

Matthew Graham's finale was, simply, packed to the rafters. We had the mysteries of the show explained and resolved. We had the main character being taken apart and put back together. We had a cast utterly acting their socks off. And, crucially, it all proved that you can have an intriguing television series, with lots of plot threads, and still have it make sense come the finale. (If you're spotting an implied swipe at another show there, then you're bang on the money.)

Watching the last episode of Ashes To Ashes had us blubbing, had us laughing, had us gripped to our seats, each time we watched it. But mostly, it had us applauding a genuinely brilliant piece of television, and arguably the most satisfying end to a drama series in many years.


BEING HUMAN
Series 2 Episode 7

Ambitious, brutal and gloriously gory, this standout episode from series two of the show that made BBC Three worth tuning into showcased everything that makes Being Human so watchable. Stylised but not over the top, the episode gave us a glimpse of Mitchell's darkest side and provided Russell Tovey with another opportunity to prove his acting chops.

One fantastic lycanthropic transformation in the streets of Bristol later, and the episode hit its peak. Roll on the third series.


BREAKING BAD
Fly

Picking the best episode from what we consider to be one of, if not the best TV series of recent years isn't an easy task, but at a push, we'd have to go with Fly. It doesn't have a lot of the hallmarks of the series, but Walt's obsession over a single fly was a great vehicle to convey his increasingly fragile mental state of mind.

He's battling with drug batches not measuring up, his relationship with his family deteriorating rapidly, and the fact that he's tormented with a guilty secret that's had devastating consequences.

With all of this on his mind, Walt shuts down and focuses, to the point of absurdity, on a single, solitary fly, claiming it could contaminate the batch of crystal meth. The outing is a classic 'bottle' episode that takes an almost microscopic look into the psyche of a good man who's done a bad thing, with the highlight being Walt's very near miss when he almost tells Jessie the truth about his girlfriend, Jane, much to the edge of seat shuffling of the audience.

It's not the most action-packed or traditionally shocking episode of Breaking Bad, but the pristine dialogue, expert performances and condensed story made for a memorable watch, and one of our favourite of the series.


CHUCK
Chuck Versus The Subway

It's possibly a bad omen, but we found it hard to include a story from season 4 of Chuck, because it's still to come alive, by our reckoning. The best season 4 has been is Chuck Versus The Couch Lock, where they leave Casey paralysed on the sofa wearing a storm trooper helmet.

So, the strongest 2010 Chuck went to the best episode of the end of season 3, Chuck Versus The Subway, in which Ellie finally finds out that Chuck is a spy, we find out that Shaw is still alive, and Casey admits to his estranged daughter that he's her father.

It combined the perfect mix of chaos, mostly because Morgan stupidly tells Devon that Ellie is having an affair, action and humour. Sadly, season 4 hasn't got to his level yet.


DEXTER
In The Beginning

In retrospect, season five of Dexter peaked a little early, leaving many disappointed with the finale. Probably the best tension in the season was offered by In The Beginning, where the latex gloves really come off in the war against Jordan Chase and his associates.

We discovered that Lumen is capable of killing just as ruthlessly as Dexter, and that ex-cop Liddy has a growing collection of pictures showing the both of them dumping body parts from a boat.

It's just a shame the end of the season didn't live up to the energy that this story injected into proceedings.


DOCTOR WHO
The Eleventh Hour

A lot to pick from this year, from The End Of Time Part II, through to the heights of the weeping angels two parter, the terrific two-part conclusion to the series, or the divisive (at least round here!) Amy's Choice.

But if we had to pick one, more of us are heading for The Eleventh Hour, an episode that, on reflection, brilliantly rebuilds and reinvents Doctor Who, whilst also putting in place strands for the show to follow for the rest of the series. It also put down a marker for the tone of the series as a whole, and - as we discovered in the series finale - laid down plot strands that would prove to be pivotal to the overall season arc. And let's not forget, too, that it has the job of introducing two new lead actors to the show, which it does effortlessly.

It's a superb hour of telly, in a terrific year for Doctor Who.


FRINGE
Entrada

Fringe was generally strong throughout 2010, so it was hard to pick just one highlight, but in the end we went with Entrada, which is where the whole Altivia plot ultimately took us.

The first episode of 2010, called Peter, was also exceptionally good, and was the foundation on which the show has since progressed. Entrada begins with the phone call from the cleaner at the Statue of Liberty gift shop that unravels the true identity of the women Peter is sleeping with, and from there all many of craziness in both dimensions is unleashed.

The skill at which the story progresses hoping back and forward between the two universes is exceptionally well executed, with great performances from both Anna Torv (Olivia and Altivia) and Joshua Jackson as Peter. It's upsetting that Fox has relegated this show to the Friday death slot in the US, because based on the quality of the writing and production, it certainly doesn't deserve that.


LOST
Ab Aeterno

The resolution to Lost might have left viewers feeling cheated out of an explanation, but at least one Season 6 episode stood with the series' best, Ab Aeterno, the episode in which we finally learned the backstory of Richard Alpert, the island's resident immortal and one of the show's most enigmatic figures.

After years of waiting, viewers were treated to a historical epic with simple human drama at its core, all crammed into 44 minutes. The most cinematic Lost ever got, and as gripping and heartbreaking on repeat viewings as it is the first time.


MAD MEN
The Suitcase

The fourth series of Mad Men was as sublimely written and acted as ever, but Matthew Weiner's 60s-set drama reached a kind of booze-soaked zenith with its seventh episode, The Suitcase. Set against the backdrop of the infamous Sonny Liston/Cassius Clay boxing match that took place on 25 May, 1965, the episode saw Don drink himself into a dribbling, mumbling stupor, and proving conclusively that he's a lover not a fighter in an amusingly inept scotch-fuelled scuffle with an ex-employee.

Mad Men excels at using historical events as a counterpoint for its personal dramas, and at offsetting unexpected flashes of humour against moments of quiet tragedy. The Suitcase did this better than any other episode of Mad Men, and as a result, it packed an unforgettable emotional punch.


MISFITS
Series 2 Episode 4

In a consistently fantastic series, this was the episode that stood out for me. The reveal of the super hoodie's identity in episode 3 was a big bombshell of a surprise, but episode 4 edges ahead by hitting emotional highs and lows all throughout.

There's a unique villain, comedy, emotional drama and some, frankly, stunning direction in some of the best 45 minutes of the year.

A perfect showcase for what television fantasy is capable of.


PSYCHOVILLE
Halloween

Writers and performers Reece Shearsmith and Steve Pemberton deliciously sent up an entire basement full of classic horror movies in this Halloween special of Psychoville.

Like Amicus' classic horror anthology movies Dr. Terror's House Of Horrors or The House That Dripped Blood, the special wove four macabre stories together to hilarious and sometimes disturbing effect. An autumn treat.


THE SARAH JANE ADVENTURES
Death Of The Doctor

These Sarah Jane Adventures crossover episodes bring the very best out of Russell T Davies, and Death Of The Doctor was no exception.

So, not only did we get the marvellous Elisabeth Sladen, we also had Matt Smith as the Doctor, and the return of Katy Manning as Jo Grant. Davies then threaded them into a terrific story, too, that was pretty much the epitome of fanboy heaven.


SHERLOCK
A Study In Pink

The second episode to be penned by Steven Moffat to appear on the list, A Study In Pink is a masterclass in how to write an opening episode. Moffat here manages to effortlessly slot Sherlock into a contemporary setting, while finding the space and time for a terrific mystery to solve.

As Den Of Geek writer James Peaty notes of the episode, it's "a study in scriptwriting". He's right, too.


SPARTACUS: BLOOD AND SAND
Kill Them All

One of the best season finales in recent years, in a show that we had doubts about after its first couple of episodes. We needn't have worried. And come the end, with Kill Them All, it was wrapping up all storylines, paving the way for the next season and dispatching pointless characters in an epic bloodbath of severed limbs and torn jugulars! Kill them all, indeed.


THE IT CROWD
The Final Countdown

It wasn't the best series of The I.T. Crowd to date, but this year's run had an absolute gem of an episode in it. We're talking about the episode where Moss joins the select gang of people to join the 8+ club on Countdown. It's brilliantly written, and offers some of the biggest belly laughs of 2010's telly schedules.

And we're not just saying that because one of our writers appeared as an extra, either...


THE WALKING DEAD
Days Gone Bye

If you follow the conventional wisdom that it takes at least a season for a television show to settle down, then the impact that The Walking Dead has made has been nothing short of sensational. And the standard was set high from the off, with the outstanding feature-length opening episode, Days Gone Bye.

Truthfully, there's more than one episode from the show's brief run that we could have highlighted here. Yet, ultimately, it was the Frank Darabont-penned and directed opener that squeezed in.

As we noted at the time, this, arguably more than any other television episode this year, is pushing the boundaries of what we can expect from television. And we've got the pleasure of a 13-episode second season to look forward to in 2011, too.

Leave your suggestions and thoughts in the comments!

Words: Simon Brew, Gaye Birch, Billy Grifter, James Hunt, Ryan Lambie, Jake Laverde, Mark Oakley, James Peaty

Click here for a list of ALL the lists at Den Of Geek...

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.

The James Clayton Column: Tron: Philosophy

$
0
0
Tron: Philosophy

Does Tron: Legacy provide a neon-fringed window into Buddhist philosophy? James certainly thinks so…

In the game, the user gets out what they put in. In the movie, the viewer gets out what they put in. So it goes when you engage with pop culture, immerse yourself in a creative experience, buy the ticket and take that ride.

Ergo, Tron: Legacy can be appreciated in a number of ways. You can simply see it as a reboot of a retro cult property amping up dated effects to today's cutting edge. You can take it as a blockbuster blast of neon visuals, electro noise and spectacular light cycle arena combat action.

The film can be swallowed as a flashy father and son reconciliation story in a hi-tech digital dimension (‘Honey, I Was Abducted by an Arcade Console'). You may also interpret it as an excuse to multiply Jeff Bridges and allow his Dude persona to do some ‘jamming' in an environment lifted out of 2001: A Space Odyssey, ultimately producing a bizarre mix of The Big Lebowski and New Age Kubrickean Yoda.

What I personally take from Tron: Legacy, though, is a lot of deep, profound stuff. Products like this - reboots packed with SFX, industrial light and magic - are inevitably going to be targeted by critics as ‘all style, no substance'. I'd argue, however, that this flick isn't about its detail, even though its details are the selling point: the main features that viscerally strike the audience and that sucked up most of the production budget.

This isn't the place or time to totally deconstruct a vast and ambitious film that's only just been released. As the Earth moves and as things sink in more over coming years, there'll be whole theses and books written. What I'll seek to do in brief is just de-rezz some of the hasty dismissals that this movie is shallow junk, dazzling eye candy devoid of value. I could be completely off grid but, hey, man, this is how my mind was illuminated at the multiplex when I took the Tron 3D trip.

Tron: Legacy is an awesome electro show and a pretty impressive piece of motion picture entertainment. It's also an incredibly relevant and resonant work, reaching into the zeitgeist and running over philosophical, intellectual and spiritual ground. This convoluted electronic gladiator blast really does have soul and intellect, if you read between the reels and appreciate it as such.

In a way, the new Tron movie is a sort of blue-tinged sister flick to The Matrix which, just over ten years ago, was blowing minds and pushing boundaries, albeit with a green-hued colour scheme. Of course, they are very different creatures with, for instance, the Wachowski Brothers' series offering a dystopian vision in which we are already in the ‘machine' overlorded by artificial intelligence. In contrast, Tron: Legacy has humans still in control outside of the machine, as long as the tyrannical Clu doesn't break out and bring his aggressive ‘perfection' mission down on our reality.

Through the big-screen blockbuster entertainment framework, both franchises glide across similar intellectual territory and highlight vital issues. Mirroring the digital age that produced them, they surf the zeitgeist and reflect the brave new world we're living in, where technology and humanity segue seamlessly.

The questions about our own identity, how we project ourselves in cyberspaces, how we engage with AI and the immense, potentially unlimited possibilities that advancement's offering are just some of the subtexts present in the Tron reload.

It provokes thought on what happens when sentient technology starts to create and generate life itself (that's my understanding of Quorra and the ISOs). Culturally, as claimed by Flynn in the flick, we could be on the verge of breakthroughs and shifts that will completely change everything. Tron: Legacy is pop culture matter reflecting an actuality in which the digital frontiers and scientific advancements are presenting potentially incredible progress for humanity.

There are a vast number of debates and techie readings floating about out there alongside all the other interpretations (the father-son stuff, the theory it's ‘Computer Game Hamlet', etc.). So far, so exceptionally complex, but I'd personally argue that the point of the whole mindboggling Tron: Legacy plot and its eye-searing action is geared towards getting to a very basic, fundamental point.

All this stuff, all this detail, all this artifice doesn't matter. Nothing matters. What we have here is pure Zen presented through your 3D specs for you to absorb over a carton of popcorn. 

I see in this film an electrified equivalent to elaborate Buddhist artwork and mandalas that provide a portal through sensory perception to immense metaphysical ideas and philosophies. Bear with me here. I did my Masters on this, studied a lot of lavish tapestries with scenes of Himalayan demon sex and learned enough to get a postgraduate degree.

We're saturated with imagery and artifice but, paradoxically, by confronting and engaging with it, we comprehend the true illusive nature of appearance. The cultural construct, movie or mandala, is a door to deeper things acting as a catalyst to enlightened realisation. Once you buy the ticket, insert the coin and immerse yourself in the actual thing you can, if you wish, proceed to those principles.

Nothing matters, and ultimately life comes down to a cosmic Universal oneness. Getting bogged down, intellectually and emotionally attached to the sensory world and in judgements is not the point. (Flynn: "You're ruining my whole Zen thing, man!") Perhaps Tron: Legacy's point isn't about the sprawling advance of a game grid over an interval period, awesome movie special effects, Walt Disney marketing hype or a complicated story of father-son reconciliation in a slick cyber chic secondary universe. Perhaps it's a digi-pathway to illumined appreciation of ultimate truths.

And Flynn is the essence of it all , the creator of this arcade game conduit to spiritual epiphany, sage wisdom dispenser and vital soul of the narrative and concept. Beyond his role explaining everything and giving us a plot to underscore the light cycle battles and Daft Punk soundtrack, he's the exemplary avatar encapsulating the Zen ethos.

The ego death in Flynn's self-sacrifices, in exile from the Grid and in the climactic destruction of himself and projected self in Clu's form, achieves peace. Both as nirvana and narrative closure, it's arrival at a state of wholeness.

You're the user, so you choose. Tron: Legacy could be trash or it could be a transcendental experience through which you find freedom from samsara and connect with universal oneness. Pure Zen freedom. Now that's bio-digital jazz, man...

James' previous column can be found here.

James sketched a series of movie spoof comics and they can be found here.

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.

Colin Firth and Tom Hooper interview: The King’s Speech, Rocky IV and more

$
0
0
The King’s Speech : (Geoffrey Rush) - Tom Hooper - Colin Firth

As The King’s Speech arrives in cinemas, we met with director Tom Hooper and star Colin Firth to chat about the film…

Anticipation for The King's Speech has been steadily building since its premiere back in September at the Toronto International Film Festival. There, it won the coveted Audience Award and later in the year it swept the British Independent Film Awards, and now, at the start of the new year, it is tipped for Golden Globe, Oscar and BAFTA success.

We're not surprised, what with the film filling many awards fodder prerequisites, being a period-set character drama that brings together themes of monarchy, disability and even a hint of World War 2 under the yoke of a brilliant cast, as Colin Firth's Prince Albert (and soon-to-be King George VI) consults unconventional speech therapist Lionel Logue (Geoffrey Rush) for help with his stammer.

Thankfully, the film is also terrific, and the roundtable interview we attended last month, with star Colin Firth and director Tom Hooper, provided much food for thought. Both spoke eloquently about the film's representation of stammering, the Royal family and history itself, while Hooper highlighted the differences (or lack of difference) between feature-length and television drama. And Firth, would you believe it, that elegant gent, dropped a Rocky IV reference. Priceless.

Have you been surprised by the response the film has been getting?

Colin Firth: Day one, we thought, "This is definitely going to win the Audience Award in Toronto." No, we spent about three hours talking about how easy it would be for us to screw this up.

Tom Hooper: The truth about this film is that it has a very fragile ecology, in that it is a film that begins with a speech and ends with a speech. I lived intimately with the fear that it wouldn't be climactic enough, it wouldn't be emotional enough, that somehow we'd be on the wrong side of the fragile ecology of the film. And even judging the stammer - so many pitfalls. It could be comedic. And even if you laughed at him only once, that would be completely misfiring. It could be so painful that you don't want to stay in the cinema.

It could be so slow that the film grinds to a halt, and at the end of 100 minutes you've only done four scenes. Or the other risk is that you fight shy of it and you don't have enough of it, and then the jeopardy and the stakes aren't high enough. So, even that alone, the conducting of the stammer, the decision about how much to have, how perpetually to have it, were very delicate.

Mr Firth, your journey was almost the reverse of the film, because you had to learn how to stammer. How hard was it to get it right?

CF: I didn't find it easy at all. Tom was part of the process of judging it, but he can't get into my larynx and help me achieve the technique. But it's something you do every time you act. If you're playing someone who's got marital problems, you have to play someone who's trying not to have marital problems. So, you've got to get into the problem first.

If you're playing someone who's impeded by fear, or shyness, or has whatever dysfunction your character might have, you have to achieve the dysfunction first, imaginatively, in order to play someone who is trying to negotiate their way out of it. So, in a way, it's just the same job again.

TH: But also, the problem is that speech therapists are to help stammerers stop having a stammer. It's hard to find a speech specialist who's trained in giving you a stammer.

CF: There aren't any books on how to stammer.

Did you watch A Fish Called Wanda?

CF: I think that's how not to... And tomorrow we've got a screening at the Michael Palin Centre for Stammering Children, with Michael Palin, whose father stammered. And we can argue over the impropriety of pastiching stammering, because I think it's probably extremely painful for people who do stammer, but it has been used a great deal.

TH: It's weirdly one of the few disabilities, it seems, [that] is still pastiched. Whereas a lot of that now is unacceptable in mainstream cinema, but it's one of the few ones that people still lampoon.

Mr Firth, you spoke recently at BAFTA about actors being in awe of their writers, can you tell us what sort of input David Seidler had for you?

CF: It was multiform, because not only did we have our writer, and the creator of our characters, but he was also our authority on stammering. You ask me if I got any help. The best help I could possibly get was David. Had we not had David, I probably would have wanted to spend serious time with someone who could take me through what that was like. But he was the guy, because he had had the problem, and he was extremely expressive about it. And I was actually quite really... I was left quite shaken by some of his eloquence.

If I remember, he compared it to being underwater. That there was this panicking, drowning sensation, which seemed to have no way out. Terrible, endless silence that you can't climb out of. He also talked about how it conditions the way you approach your day, down to the last detail. If you have an important encounter that day, the outcome of which might change your life, you're still only focusing on whether you'll be able to get the words out. That will loom larger over than the bigger picture of what you're trying to achieve. It affects what you order in a restaurant, whether you can say the word that begins with this letter or that letter.

And it made me realise that this was not something that you could isolate. It is something which absolutely consumes you and your identity. And I think that the struggle we witness in the film isn't about curing a stammer. It's about managing it to the extent that that is no longer what's happening. And that is absolutely achievable.

And David is proof of that, because you wouldn't guess that he stammers, and he claims he still does. But you wouldn't guess that, as a man in his seventies now. So, that's why I think that the film can be honestly hopeful.

If it was in the business of miracle cures, which Tom was determined it wouldn't be, it would have been disingenuous, for a start. It would have been cheesy, and it probably would have even a terrible letdown to people who really have to face this. What it does promise is that people can reach an accommodation with this problem, where it is no longer as debilitating.

Was that more important to the character than the fact that you were playing royalty?

TH: Well, put it this way, you're never going to have a member of the Royal family in an audience at a Q&A, commenting about how well you played them. Whereas we've certainly had many stammerers at many Q&As talk about how well Colin caught their condition.

CF: That was my main concern in terms of how people responded. I was sensitive to the fact that our characters have living relatives, and I didn't completely ignore the fact that one of the characters was the reigning Queen! But I would be equally sensitive to the living relatives of the Logue family, of which there are many, and many of whom we've met now.

But I was more concerned with how people who stammer would respond, because any inauthenticity would be doing a terrible disservice in that direction. But it's a mystery, and playing a member of the Royal family remains a mystery.

I often feel I've played a character, and I've come away with perhaps just a glimpse at what that life might be. I've played soldiers on more than one occasion, and even though I can't fully imagine it, I've got a whiff of it. Partly because I've spoken to soldiers, and I've listened to some very engaging accounts, stirring accounts of what that life is like. I haven't had that with a member of the Royal family, and I've come out on the other side of this without a clue as to what it might be like.

Does that make it any less authentic, do you think?

CF: Quite possibly. It might render it completely inauthentic. We worked very, very hard for accuracy. We had people who actually do know the Royal family around us.

TH: We had a couple of the Royal biographers, like Hugo Vickers and Philip Ziegler, who between them have written some of the best biographies of Edward VIII and the Queen Mother.

CF: Plus, a lot of our dialogue were quotes from these men. Not just from the diaries, but also from written accounts. It's full of exact quotes. The scene of George V's death is a precise reconstruction of the accounts that we had of that death. "I hope I will make good as he has made good. Long live the King." All accounted.

We were scrupulous in finding everything as authentically as we possibly could, but what I'm saying is, despite my efforts, I entered into an imaginary world based on all the evidence that we could get our hands on in order to make it as real as I possible could. But I still came out on the other side knowing it was an imaginative journey.

TH: The point is, if you're making a film about many professions - if you're making a film about a cab driver, you can go and hang out with a cab driver, or go and drive a taxi, even. Whereas, if you make a film about a monarch, you can't go and hang out with the Queen.

CF: Particularly a dead one! I would have loved to have control of the country for a couple of days. But you don't get to try out the job. But my profession is full of that. It's no different from if I was playing someone from the 17th century, which I have. I can't bring you absolute truth in the detailed factual sense. All I can do is bring you an interpretation as I understand it. That's all you can ever get from an actor.

The script was originally written 30 years ago, but was held back because the Queen Mother didn't want the story told while she was still alive. Were there any approaches made this time to get permission from the Royals?

TH: I think, to be fair to David Seidler, having waited 30 years, he wasn't about to fall into the trap of writing to the next generation...

CF: David's in his seventies!

TH: So, I think the respect has been paid. I did write to the Queen via the Assistant Private Secretary, as I was instructed to do, to let her know that the film was happening, and to show her the courtesy of informing her about it. But, no. Maybe you could argue that David learned his lesson from the first time he wrote! [laughs]

Regarding the audience of the film, the English trailer seems to highlight the film as more of a drama, whereas it's actually very funny.

TH: I find that impossible to judge, because I'm so inside it. It's difficult, because I think the American trailer is cut more for humour, and we live in a world where, when you go online, most people won't even know which trailer they're seeing. So, I think it's probably good that there are two slightly different trailers out there in the world.

CF: Just anecdotally, the first responses I got when the trailer went online for the first time were from very young people. In fact, only young people, saying they can't wait to see it, which surprised me enormously. And I don't know which trailer they saw.

Mr Hooper, you have brought quite a few real people's lives to the screen. What are some of the pleasures and pressures involved in that?

TH: I think, quite honestly, a lot of it has been a response to the struggle to find original, fiction screenwriting which presents me with characters as complex, and predicaments that are as extreme as the real stories that I've encountered. And I so like making character-driven work, and the great thing about dealing with people about whom we have historical resources, is that if the writing needs work, there's everywhere to go to enrich it. And it's hard to find characters of the complexity of Brian Clough, or King George VI or John Adams in original writing.

So, it partly comes from that, but I certainly have an enduring interest in iconic personalities and what they reflect back about national identity.

In John Adams, I had this opportunity to see whether it was possible to trace this great schism in political values in America back to the personalities of the founding fathers, at a time when it was going out during the primaries in 2008. So, it was very interesting to tell the creation story at that time in America.

And in this film, I think it's very interesting to, in a way, through this film, meditate on the monarchy, because what's interesting is that, although there is conflict about the monarchy, it's not under attack, at least not in my lifetime. It's very stable. And I, in the end, feel that the source of that stability can be found in King George VI's story, because the abdication crisis is probably the closest we came to any major constitutional crisis about having the monarchy.

And you look at King George VI's story. The classic attack on the monarchy would be that it enshrines an idea of inherited class privilege that's absolutely inappropriate in a modern democracy. But with King George VI, the notion of privilege is almost entirely debunked, because, okay, his childhood - abused by the nanny, neglected by the parents - that's not privilege. Becoming king, well, that was his idea of a nightmare, so that's not privilege. And suddenly the very thing you use to attack it seems to fall apart in this case.

And more than that, in the war, I think that because the nation knew he had a stammer, and knew he was fighting this impediment when he spoke, he did more to humanise the monarchy than probably anyone else had ever done. And also, I think that when he reached out and talked about people's suffering in the war, this was a man who was suffering even to talk to you, so there was an authenticity about his claim to understand suffering that won him a place in people's hearts, and probably made the monarchy much more solid.

And so, sometimes to think about why some institutions are stable, it's interesting to go one generation back and look at the author of that stability.

You mention John Adams there in comparison to this film. Of course, that is a television drama as opposed to a feature-length drama. Television drama as an artform has progressed a lot in the last twenty years. Do you still see a differentiation between the two media?

TH: The key differentiation, in terms of the experience, is not the making of it, which is profoundly similar and I don't really see much difference in the creative process between the two forms, apart from perhaps the time you've got to tell the story. The difference is definitely this part of it, which is the level of scrutiny and marketing scrutiny and amount of work you have to do to release a film.

John Adams was a $100 million HBO show. We probably did a 10 day marketing period. And this, it will be months by the time it's finished. So, at the moment that's the biggest difference.

And there's probably still, sadly, a status differential, because the world gets much more obsessed about the Oscar race than it does about the Emmy race, but that's not something that should affect your choices about the work you want to do. I think you've still got to do the best work that comes in front of you. Whether it's TV or film doesn't matter.

I got my film education from television. The best films I've ever seen - the Godfather trilogy, most of Scorsese - were on TV. So, the best TV I've ever seen is feature films. I didn't grow up thinking there was a way to shoot TV and a way to shoot movies, because the best movies I'd ever seen were generally on TV, and they worked great. So, I've never seen a huge difference.

There is a scene in the film, where King George VI watches newsreel footage of Hitler, and says that he has no idea what he's saying, but he's saying it rather well. Was there any sensitivity surrounding that, as it shows the King speaking positively about Hitler?

CF: He doesn't know what he's saying. There are a couple of things here-  I think it's....

TH: I think it's quite funny.

CF: It is quite funny...

TH: It was his line, by the way.

CF: I did make up that line! [Hooper laughs] I am responsible, I'm afraid. I think, paradoxical as it may be, that's the situation in which he finds himself at that moment. This is my adversary, look what he can do with the power of speech. I am terrified of the microphone and he is using it to hypnotic effect. To amass people to follow him and to grab power where possible, and to commit genocide.

He's not listening to the words. It's not saying anything favourable about Hitler, except the fact that he can do his day job as a speaker better than I can, so to speak. It's basically before the big fight, when Rocky goes up in front of the big Russian guy. You have to build up your enemy, and say, "That's what I'm up against." We're not saying anything positive about Hitler at all, except the fact that he can speak well, which you can't argue with.

Hitler invaded Poland on September 1st 1939. Britain declared war on Hitler two days later. This is a man who led his country into a six year war against that man, and the speech is there to denounce absolutely everything that Nazism represents. And one of the things that, as Tom said, people could believe in him when he said "I suffer with you", because he suffered just to make the microphone, and that gave him some credibility. But they could also believe him when he was denouncing the principle that might is right.

This is the man who didn't want to be king. He didn't want the power, he didn't want the limelight. He didn't have that kind of ego. And so, he absolutely embodies everything that is the antithesis of Nazism. He just wishes he could speak better.

The King's Speech is released on January 7th.

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.

The King’s Speech review

$
0
0
The King’s Speech

Monarchic character drama The King’s Speech has already received much acclaim, but is it as good as King Ralph? Here’s Michael’s review…

Just how relevant are the Royal family, anyway? On the one hand, you have the Prince of Wales' car being smeared with paint, which some deem more important news than the government's policy on higher education. On the other, there are those gleefully looking forward to the glut of bank holidays coming in early May, uninterested in the reason.

And here we have The King's Speech, a film that, at first glance, seems to be spinning royal themes into awards fodder in a similar way to 2006's hugely successful The Queen, and even though both films share a similar set-up of distant monarchy startled by public matters, then re-aligning their private business before our gaze, it is a rather different beast. One that, even when stripped of its major, monarchic themes, is still a compelling, wholly affecting character drama.

At its heart lies the story of two men of differing social classes forming an enduring friendship. One of the two just happens to be King of the United Kingdom (and the last Emperor of India, to boot).

Prince Albert (Colin Firth), second in line to the throne, yet destined to one day become King George VI, is beset with a stammer, which wouldn't be much of a problem for a member of the Royal family, but the 20th century's rise of radio broadcasts and public speaking renders this more than a private problem. After every avenue seems to have been exhausted, Albert's wife, Elizabeth (Helena Bonham Carter) -we know her as the Queen Mum - pays a visit to the idiosyncratic Australian speech therapist Lionel Logue (Geoffrey Rush), whose unorthodox techniques first and foremost consist of a complete rejection of the stuffy formalities of royal convention.

With its well-worn themes of friendship across social boundaries, the overcoming of debilitating flaws, and the upper classes brought down to human levels, surprise isn't a quality The King's Speech possesses, but it has much to offer.

Most immediately, the performances are stellar. Firth, in particular, manages to step into what does, in theory, sound like one of the many Darcy-esque, aristocratic roles that made his name, and bring to it not only considerable dignity and dry wit, but also a devastating vulnerability and an emotional fragility that recalls his revelatory work in A Single Man.

Likewise, Rush and Bonham Carter are delightful, with the former, in particular, filling out Logue with a kooky sense of irreverence that never oversteps the mark. After all, the scenes between the two men make up the film's meat. It is where David Seidler's script finds its best footing, as a frequently comic two-hander where Logue susses out his new patient and slowly applies his odd exercises to help bolster confidence, and calm his nerves, in preparation for his public duties.

The stammer, after all, would make or break the picture as a whole, and it is handled perfectly. Firth's performance is not overworked, and through some subtle sound design, the clicks and cracks of spittle, tongue and teeth unable to form words become completely engaging. Likewise, the audience becomes accustomed, like Albert, to fear public speaking, as each appearance or speech is preceded by long tracking shots, building tension towards the looming silence of the microphone.

It is with such subtle stylistic flourishes that director Tom Hooper works, creating a film that is meticulous, yet economical.

Indeed, it is only in its wider themes of the royalty speaking for the nation, as war looms and King George VI delivers an integral speech against Nazi aggression, that the film stands with anything less than perfect posture. Perhaps it is the closed-in perspective, or our twenty-first century eyes looking with cynicism at times past, but is it true that the monarch speaks for the populace, despite holding little power? It is a question the film never truly answers, as the common people reside, quite understandably, considering the script's focus, at the edges of the frame.

That aside, we are presented with a polished, well-rounded drama that subtly and artfully crafts its personal themes. It will certainly garner awards attention, especially for its three primary actors, and, apart from being up against perhaps more deserving competition, there is no serious criticism that should prevent it from scoring a handful of wins.

4 stars

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.


Shiny new trailer: Ice Age: Continental Drift

$
0
0
Ice Age 4

Scrat the sabre-toothed squirrel features heavily in the new trailer for Ice Age: Continental Drift…

Ice Age 4's portrayal of continental drift will, no doubt, have geologists grinding their teeth with fury (lest we forget the dinosaurs appearing in the last one), but for those who've watched and appreciate the previous films' Palaeolithic animal adventures, this latest instalment in the animated franchise will be a welcome one.

In the film, Ray Romano, John Leguizamo, Denis Leary and Queen Latifah reprise their roles as Manny, Sid, Diego and Ellie, while the first trailer located below features director Chris Wedge as the hapless sabre-toothed squirrel, Scrat. Unsurprisingly, he's still trying to hold on to his precious acorns, even as the world falls apart.

Ice Age: Continental Drift opens in the UK on 6 July and 13 July in the US.

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.

Exclusive: The Green Hornet action featurette

$
0
0
Behind the explosive scenes on The Green Hornet

Go behind the scenes of the incoming The Green Hornet, with a look at some of the film's action work...

Arriving in cinemas one week from today, it's taken a long time for the movie of The Green Hornet to make it to the big screen.

However, the wait's nearly over, and to get you in the mood for the film, we've got this exclusive behind-the-scenes action featurette. Which, if Internet magic is working, you can see below these words. Win.

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.

Star Wars Blu-ray officially announced

$
0
0
Star Wars: The Complete Saga on Blu-ray

All six Star Wars films are arriving on Blu-ray this September. And we’ve got the official details here…

As had been speculated earlier in the week, LucasFilm has taken the wraps off plans for the release of Star Wars on Blu-ray later this year.

All six films are set for release in the UK in September, and are available for pre-order now. And you've got a choice of three different boxsets to pick from.

The biggie is the nine-disc complete saga set, which gives you all six films and three further discs, with "more than 30 hours of extensive special features, including never-before-seen deleted and alternate scenes, an exploration of the exclusive Star Wars archives, and much more".

That nine disc collection will set you back £89.99 before discounting.

If you prefer either the prequel or the original trilogy in isolation, though, then both will be available in individual boxsets at £44.99 apiece. Although we're not sure who would buy the prequel trilogy and leave the original films on the shelf.

The films will not be available individually at this stage.

We're yet to discover just how much, if any, tinkering George Lucas has done with the films themselves, but there's plenty of time to find out about that between now and September.

You can preorder Star Wars on Blu-ray now.

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.

Geek shows and movies on UK TV in the coming week

$
0
0
Slither

Hustle is back, Episodes begins, the UK gets No Ordinary Family, and more Breaking Bad. Plus there are plenty of films on telly worth catching in the week ahead...

After a skipped week for the holiday, we can enter 2011 in style with a week of great programming that sees a few favourites return for our viewing pleasure.

If you missed Not Going Out last night, you can still watch the fourth series premiere episode, Drugs, tonight at midnight if you have BBC HD, or catch up on iPlayer here, then follow the series on Thursdays at 9:30pm on BBC1. The show, which stars stellar comedians Lee Mack and Tim Vine, had a terrific first outing, which we've reviewed here, so you can stop back and add your impressions when you've seen it.

We get another chance to catch Doctor Who At The Proms 2010 in an abbreviated, but appreciated opportunity to hear Murray Gold's scores in all their full orchestral glory tonight, Friday, January 7th at 7:00pm on BBC3, with appearances by host, Amy Pond, and visiting Matt Smith and Arthur Darvill.

Then, later tonight on BBC1 is the returning Hustle, now in its seventh series, which airs its first of six episodes tonight Friday, January 7th at 9:00pm. The team return to our screens and their lives of crime as they help out the hapless Eddie this week. No doubt they'll take the mickey, even as they offer aid, in a welcome return to the telly schedules.

The weekend brings a more specialist programme for anyone interested in Hollywood, glamour and photography. Screen goddesses and matinee idols of Tinsel Town's golden era are explored through the portraits that helped create the facades and fascination as Shooting The Hollywood Stars airs on BBC 2 at 8:00pm on Saturday, January 8th.

A new comedy series, Episodes, starts at 10:00pm Monday, January 10th on BBC2. It follows the adventures of a British screenwriting couple when their popular TV series is to be remade in the US. A joint production with BBC and Showtime, the show stars Stephen Mangan and Tamsin Greig along with Friends star Matt LeBlanc, who plays himself, but with an exaggerated twist a la Larry David. If the series can stomach the awful truths of the transatlantic horrors that can occur when shows move shores, and still serve up enough laughs to satisfy, this could be a quite interesting topic to explore.

We're less anxious for the move here of the US series No Ordinary Family. The pilot will be shown on Tuesday, January 11th at 8:00pm on Watch, but we think the majority of the show may be better suited to family viewing than what card carrying geeks would want or expect, as Billy's reviews bear out.

Lastly, we have two series of a show which hasn't had nearly enough mentions in these pages. Breaking Bad, the award-winning US drama, will show its second season starting Wednesday, January 12th at 11:40pm on Five USA, with Seven Thirty-Seven, the first of thirteen gripping episodes in the life of Walter White. If you've not yet seen the show, you can catch it from the start, as the first season is being reshown on FX. The series pilot airs again on Sunday night, January 9th at midnight, with the next episode, Cat's In The Bag, on Wednesday, January 12th at 10:00pm. If you have seen the show, you'll know why we're not saying much about what it's about, as even a few words would spoil it.

Now, on to the films showing through the weekend and a bit beyond. There are no less than four selections for members of the Cult of Nic Cage as well as one very good and one very bad vehicle for 30 Rock funny man, Alec Baldwin. (See if you can spot which is which.) As always, if we missed anything interesting, have a shout in the comments, with our thanks.



Please also note: the ordinal numbers for dates will help you scan through this simple list with your browser's search function. Enter '8th' in your browser's Find box or window to highlight and/or tab through all movies shown on Saturday. Enjoy!


8MM
On: Five USA
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 10:00pm (and 11:00pm Five USA+1)

A River Runs Through It
On: more4
Date: Friday 7th January
Time: 11:15am

Aeon Flux

On: E4    
Date: Sunday 9th January
Time: 9:00pm (and 10:00pm E4+1)

Alien Nation
On: Film4
Date: Monday 10th January
Time: 11:15pm (and 00:15am 11th Jan Film4+1)

Back To The Future
On: ITV2
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 10:00am (and 11:00am ITV2+1)

Bill And Ted's Bogus Journey
On: LIVING   
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 4:00pm (and 5:00pm Living+1, noon/1:00pm 9th Jan)

Birdman Of Alcatraz
On: TCM   
Date: Sunday 9th January
Time: 9:00pm

Bugsy Malone
On: Film4
Date: Friday 7th January
Time: 5:00pm (and 6:00pm Film4+1, 11:00/noon 9th Jan)

Cars

On: BBC 3
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 7:00pm

Children Of Men
On: ITV1  
Date: Tuesday 11th January
Time: 10:35pm

Collateral
On: Film4  
Date: Monday 10th January
Time: 9:00pm (and 10:00pm Film4+1)

Constantine

On: ITV1
Date: Wednesday 12th January
Time: 10:35pm

Crazy Heart

On: Sky Movies Premiere  
Date: Friday 7th January
Time: 10:15pm (and 11:15pm Premiere+1, then daily at those times through 10th Jan)

Cronos

On: Film4
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 10:50pm (and 11:50pm Film4+1)

Die Another Day
On: ITV2
Date: Friday 7th January
Time: 9:00pm (and 10:00pm ITV2+1, 6:20/7:20pm 8th Jan)

Die Hard With A Vengeance
On: Watch
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 10:00pm (and 11:00pm Watch+1, 9/10:00pm 9th Jan)

Equus
On: TCM
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 01:20am

Gosford Park
On: more4
Date: Friday 7th January
Time: 9:00pm (and 00:45am 8th Jan)

Harold And Kumar Get The Munchies
On: Comedy Central  
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 11:10pm (and 00:10am 9th Jan CC+1)

Hot Fuzz
On: ITV2
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 11:00pm (and midnight ITV2+1, 9/10:00pm 13th Jan)

Hot Shots!
On: Channel 4   
Date: Thursday 13th January
Time: 11:10pm

Indiana Jones And The Temple of Doom
On: BBC 1  
Date: Wednesday 12th January
Time: 8:10pm

Iron Man
On: Channel 4
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 6:40pm (and 7:40pm 4+1)

Madagascar
On: BBC 3
Date: Friday 7th January
Time: 8:00pm (and 7:00pm 12th Jan)

My Cousin Vinny

On: Sky1   
Date: Sunday 9th January 2
Time: 9:00pm (and 9:00pm 11th Jan Sky2, 9:00pm 13th Jan Sky1)

National Treasure: Book Of Secrets

On: BBC 1   
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 10:30pm

Opera
On: horror channel  
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 10:55pm

Peggy Sue Got Married
On: GOLD   
Date: Sunday 9th January
Time: 00:50am (and 1:50am Gold+1, 11:05pm/00:05am 9th/10th Jan)

Phone Booth

On: Film4    
Date: Friday 7th January
Time: 10:50pm (and 11:50pm Film4+1)

Planet Of The Apes
On: Film4  
Date: Sunday 9th January
Time: 6:50pm (and 7:50pm Film4+1)

Resident Evil
On: Film4
Date: Friday 7th January
Time: 9:00pm (and 10:00pm Film4+1)

RoboCop
On: SyFy
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 10:00pm (and 11:00pm Syfy+1, 1:40/2:40 am 11th Jan)

Saturday Night And Sunday Morning

On: TCM
Date: Friday 7th January
Time: 7:20pm (and 11:30am 8th Jan)

Se7en
On: TCM   
Date: Tuesday 11th January
Time: 9:00pm (and 1:40am 12th Jan)

Sherlock Holmes
On: Sky Movies Premiere   
Date: Friday 7th January
Time: 10:00am (and 11:00am Premiere+1 & 8/9:00pm, then daily at those times through Jan 13th)

Silent Hill
On: Film4
Date: Tuesday 11th January
Time: 11:05pm (and 00:05am 12th Jan Film4+1)

Slither
On: Film4
Date: Sunday 9th January
Time: 11:40pm (and 00:40am 10th Jan Film4+1)

Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country
On: Film4   
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 1:00pm (and 2:00pm Film4+1)

Star Trek: Generations

On: Film4
Date: Monday 10th January
Time: 6:40pm (and 7:40pm Film4+1)

Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace
On: ITV1  
Date: Saturday 8th January 2)
Time: 3:35pm

The Bone Collector
On: Five
Date: Thursday 13th January
Time: 9:00pm

The Bourne Identity
On: ITV2  
Date: Monday 10th January
Time: 10:00pm (and 11:00pm ITV2+1)

The Bourne Supremacy
On: ITV2   
Date: Tuesday 11th January
Time: 9:00pm (and 10:00pm ITV2+1)

The Bourne Ultimatum

On: ITV2    
Date: Wednesday 12th January
Time: 9:00pm (and 10:00pm ITV2+1)

The Castle Of Cagliostro
On: Channel 4  
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 02:40am (and 3:40am 4+1)

The Goonies
On: TCM
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 3:00pm (and 6:45am 9th Jan)

The Great Outdoors

On: ITV4
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 5:15pm (and 6:15pm ITV4+1)

The Hunt For Red October

On: Film4
Date: Sunday 9th January
Time: 9:00pm (and 10:00pm Film4+1)

The Incredibles

On: BBC 3
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 8:50pm

The Kite Runner
On: BBC 2  
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 9:45pm

The Last Samurai
On: TCM   
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 9:00pm (and 10/11:00pm 9th Jan ITV2/+1)

The Long Kiss Goodnight
On: Five
Date: Sunday 9th January
Time: 9:00pm

The Manchurian Candidate (1962)
On: TCM  
Date: Sunday 9th January
Time: 12:35pm (and 5:00am 10th Jan)

The Men Who Stare At Goats

On: BBC 2   
Date: Sunday 9th January
Time: 10:00pm

The Princess Bride
On: Five  
Date: Sunday 9th January
Time: 3:25pm

The Shadow
On: ITV4
Date: Saturday 8th January
Time: 00:55am (and 1:55am ITV4+1)

The Weatherman
On: BBC 1     
Date: Friday 7th January
Time: 11:30pm

The Truman Show
On: Film4
Date: Friday 7th January
Time: 7:00pm (and 8:00pm Film4+1)

Three Kings
On: ITV2
Date: Sunday 9th January
Time: 01:55am (and 2:55am ITV2+1, 11:55pm/00:15am 12th/13th Jan)

Timecop
On: BBC 1  
Date: Thursday 13th January 2
Time: 00:05am

Unforgiven
On: ITV4
Date: Tuesday 11th January
Time: 11:55pm (and 00:55am 12th Jan ITV4+1, 9/10:00pm 13th Jan)

WALL-E

On: BBC 3
Date: Sunday 9th January
Time: 8:30pm

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.

First trailer for John Carpenter’s The Ward

$
0
0
John Carpenter’s The Ward

The brand new and long-awaited film from John Carpenter is weeks away. And here’s the trailer for The Ward…

It's been a long time coming, but finally, the brand new film from director John Carpenter (his first cinematic release since Ghosts Of Mars) is nearly upon us. His new film, The Ward, arrives on UK cinema screens on 21st January, and early word on the film has been solid.

To get a taster of it, we've got the newly-released trailer for it right here. And can we just say that we hope it's not quite so long until Mr Carpenter makes his next feature?

Follow Den Of Geek on Twitter right here.

Viewing all 36238 articles
Browse latest View live